You are here

Displaying 71 - 80 of 124. Show 5 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 60 results per page.
Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) call, how does the ERC treat the request to extend the eligibility time-window in case of clinical training?
A:

For clinical training, an extension can be granted corresponding to the documented amount of clinical training received by the PI after the award of the first eligible degree up to a maximum of 4 years (counting up until the call deadline). For applicants to the ERC-2021-COG call whose first eligible degree is a degree in medicine, clinical training can be accepted from the date of the completion of their medical degree. No extension will be accepted for serving as a house doctor or hospital doctor unless it is part of a clinical training programme. In case of part-time clinical training, the exact total training time will be accepted on a pro-rata basis to extend the eligibility window of the applicant.

Supporting documents: an official document signed by the employer (usually a hospital) certifying start and end date(s) of the individual training period(s). Any document should mention the type of training. If the training was conducted part-time, this should be stated. It is acceptable if the training happened over several periods and for different clinical specialties.

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) call, what will happen if the PhD certificate is not submitted together with the proposal?
A:

According to the conditions of the ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) call, as long as no PhD document or equivalent is uploaded in the Funding & Tenders Portal, it will not be possible to validate/submit the proposal. A warning message will inform the applicant of the missing document. If another document is uploaded instead and the PhD certificate is missing, the ERCEA may contact the PI and ask for a clarification and the missing document. For more information, see section 'Admissibility and eligibility criteria' of the ERC Work Programme 2021.

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) call, is a Medical Doctor degree equivalent to a PhD degree?
A:

According to the ERC Work Programme 2021, for medical doctors (or applicants holding a degree in medicine), a first degree in medicine will not be accepted by itself as equivalent to a PhD award. To be considered an eligible Principal Investigator, applicants holding a degree in medicine need to provide the certificates of both the medical degree and a PhD or proof of an appointment that requires doctoral equivalency (e.g. post-doctoral fellowship, professorship appointment). Additionally, applicants must also provide information on their research experience (including peer-reviewed publications) in order to further substantiate the equivalence of their overall training to a PhD. In these cases, the certified date of the medical degree completion plus two years is the reference date of the actual award used for the calculation of the eligibility time period established for Consolidator Grant in the section "Eligible Principal Investigator". For more information, see sections 'Admissibility and eligibility criteria' and Annex 2 ERC policy on PhD and equivalent doctoral degrees' of the ERC Work Programme 2021 and section 4.3 of the Information for Applicants document to the Starting (ERC-2021-STG) and Consolidator Grant (ERC-2021-COG) 2021 Calls.

Q: Must the Principal Investigators applying for an ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) choose the appropriate ERC peer review evaluation panel for their proposal?
A:

According to the conditions of the ERC Consolidator Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-COG) call, it is the applicant’s responsibility to choose and indicate the most relevant ERC Panel (‘primary evaluation panel’) for the evaluation of the proposed research and to indicate one or more ERC key words representing the research fields involved. The PI may indicate a second relevant panel. The initial allocation of the proposal to a panel will be based on the preference expressed by the applicant. However, when necessary due to the expertise required for the evaluation, a proposal may be reallocated to a different panel with the agreement of both panel chairs concerned. The composition of the ERC evaluation panels are by nature multi-disciplinary. The primary allocated panel will determine if additional reviews by appropriate members of other panel(s) or additional remote experts are needed. The applicant should indicate when they believe that their proposal is of a cross-panel or cross-domain nature. Further explanations can be found in the Information for Applicants document to the Starting and Consolidator Grant 2021 Calls.

Q: According to the conditions applied to the ERC frontier research Grants 2021, can a researcher participate as PI in more than 1 ERC frontier research proposal at the same time? Is it possible to receive funding for more than 1 participation in such case?
A:

According to the conditions applied to the ERC frontier research Grants 2021, there are four main restrictions to be considered for Principal Investigators in this regard:

  1. A researcher may participate as Principal Investigator [Including all Principal Investigators supported under the Synergy Grant] in only one ERC frontier research project at any one time. A new frontier research project can only start after the duration of the project fixed in a previous frontier research ERC grant agreement has ended.
  2. A researcher participating as Principal Investigator in an ERC frontier research project may not submit a proposal for another ERC frontier research grant, unless the existing project ends no more than two years after the call deadline. [NB According to the duration of the project fixed in a previous frontier research ERC grant agreement].
  3. A PI who is a serving as a Panel Member for a 2021 ERC call or who served as a Panel Member for a 2019 ERC call may not apply to a 2021 ERC call for the same type of grant. [NB: The members of the ERC panels alternate to allow panel members to apply to the ERC calls in alternate years].
  4. A Principal Investigator may submit proposals to different ERC frontier research grant calls published under the same Work Programme, but only the first eligible proposal will be evaluated.

These restrictions are specified in the ERC Work Programme 2021 and may be modified in future work programmes by the ERC Scientific Council in the light of experience. Please note however that it is possible to participate in more than one ERC grant as a team member.

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Starting Grant 2021 (ERC-2021-StG) call, would a male applicant who is entitled to maternity leave from the social security system in his country be granted an 18-month extension for maternity?
A:

As indicated in the ERC Work Programme 2021, the eligibility periods can be extended in case of specific and properly documented circumstances. In case of maternity, the Principal Investigators (PIs) may request: 18 months extension for each child born before or after the PhD award. If the applicant can document a longer maternity leave, the eligibility period will be extended by the documented amount of actual leave taken until the call deadline.

The ERCEA is trying to follow the national rules in order to accommodate different couple/family scenarios. Hence, for the partner who was entitled to ‘maternity leave’ according to the national rules we would apply the same, provided that it is properly documented.

If, in light of the above, the male applicant considers that he should be entitled to the extension based on maternity leave, he should make the case and together with his application submit all relevant supporting documentation, including also documents from the national Social Security scheme (see more details on the supporting documents in the Information for Applicants).

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Starting Grant (ERC-2021-StG) call, what information should the applicant include in the Section 3 - Budget of the online submission form?
A:

The budget table and description of resources are part of the online submission form Part A (Section 3 - Budget). The description and justification of the resources should be provided in the text box (Section C. Resources) under the budget table.

The budget section contains the proposal budget including the ‘total eligible project costs’ and the ‘Requested EU contribution’ for the project. The budget is subdivided in personnel costs, travel and subsistence, equipment, consumables, publications (including any costs related to Open Access), other additional direct costs, internally invoiced goods and services, and any envisaged subcontracting costs. The budget table will provide automatically one budget line per beneficiary. Applicants should indicate the costs for each cost category as accurately as possible using only Euro integers.

In case the ‘total eligible costs’ differ from the ‘requested EU contribution’, specify in the Resources section what exactly is funded from other sources.

Applicants should carefully check all the values of the budget table. The ‘Total eligible costs’ of the project will be automatically calculated based on the figures inserted in the individual columns. The ‘Requested EU contribution’ has to be filled in manually. Please make sure to update the ‘Requested EU contribution’ if updates are made in any of the cost categories.

In the Section C. Resources, the applicant should state and fully justify the amount of funding considered necessary to fulfil the objectives for the duration of the project. The project cost estimation should be as accurate as possible. The evaluation panels assess the estimated costs carefully; unjustified budgets will be consequently reduced.

Applicants should:

  • Take into account the dedicated working time to run the project when estimating personnel costs. They should describe the size and nature of the team, indicating, where appropriate, the key team members and their roles. The participation of team members engaged by other host institutions should be justified and in relation to the additional financial cost this may impose.
  • Include a short technical description of any requested equipment, why they need it and how much they plan to use it for the project.
  • Include a realistic estimation of the costs for Open Access to project outputs. Costs for providing immediate Open Access to publications (article processing charges/book processing charges) are eligible if they are incurred during the lifetime of the project.
  • Specify the cost items covered by 'Other personnel costs' category as well as ‘Other additional direct costs' category if applicable.
  • As regards ‘Internally invoiced goods and services’, costs for host institution invoices and invoices for other entities should be included under this heading e.g. access to large facilities, access to other services that are charged as unit costs.
  • Specify the requested amount for additional funding if applicable (all items MUST be included in the overall budget table under the relevant individual columns) and they should justify the request.
  • Specify if they will use third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action (if applicable).

More explanation can be found in the ERC Information for Applicants.

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Starting Grant (ERC-2021-StG) call, how will the budget table and justification of resources be made available to the experts?
A:

The budget table and description of resources will be extracted from the online submission form Part A (Section 3 - Budget) and made available to the experts evaluating the proposal. Please see Annex 4.6 of the Information for Applicants document for an example of the Proposal Budget Report. It shows how experts will see the information entered in section 3 - Budget (including “Section C. Resources”).

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Starting Grant (ERC-2021-StG) call, how will the budget table and justification of resources be counted towards the page limit?
A:

The budget table and the justification of the Resources will not count towards the page limit of Part B2 anymore (which is a change compared to the StG 2020 call).

The budget table and description of resources are part of the online submission form Part A (Section 3 – Budget). The section C. resources has a maximum length of 8000 characters (including spaces) which corresponds approximately to 2 pages. Please refer to section 2.3 of the Information for Applicants document for further instruction on how to draw up the budget.

Q: According to the conditions of the ERC Starting Grant (ERC-2021-StG) call, where should the applicant include the budget table and justification of resources?
A:

The budget table and description of resources are part of the online submission form Part A (Section 3 - Budget). The description and justification of the resources should be provided in the text box (Section C. Resources) under the budget table.

The applicant should NOT include any description of resources or budget table in Part B2.